meilynx
AI compliance platform · Financial services

Prove your AI is compliant.To any examiner.

From prompt to examiner — one audit chain. The end-to-end AI compliance system for finance: inline policy enforcement, agent and MCP governance, and a tamper-evident audit trail — inside your perimeter.

Direct control mapping:SR 11-7NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500FINRA 24-09MNPI & PII detectionmodel risk inventory
AI traffic interception · proxyready
prompt → "
Custom policies
organizational rules · allow/deny
PII / MNPI
detect · redact at request layer
Agent / MCP interception
tool calls · agent calls inspected
Budget
per-project|customer|department cost enforced
LLM provider
Anthropic · OpenAI · Azure
downstream
tamper-evident audit chain
every request sealed & hash-linked — even blocked ones
allowed
9f3a1c
blocked
7e02b4
Examination package
sealing…

One proxy in front of every provider you run

OpenAI
Anthropic
Google
Azure OpenAI
What makes AI traffic unique

A regulated data flow nothing in your stack was built to govern.

Every prompt and response is a new, non-deterministic decision that carries your most sensitive data across a third-party boundary. Your existing controls weren't designed to see it — let alone prove what happened to an examiner.

01

Non-deterministic by nature

The same prompt returns different output every time. You can't sign off once and assume it holds — every call is a new decision that has to be governed and recorded.

02

Your most sensitive data, across a trust boundary

MNPI, client identifiers, and account data flow into prompts and out in responses — handed to a third-party model outside your walls on every call. Who saw what, and what came back, is exactly what an examiner asks.

03

Agents now act on their own

Tool calls, retries, and sub-agents take actions no human reviewed. Each one is a decision you have to be able to reconstruct and explain after the fact.

04

Your existing controls can't see it

DLP sees files, SIEM sees logs, APM sees latency. None of them read the prompt-and-response semantics where the actual risk — and the actual evidence — lives.

AI traffic is a regulated data flow — and examiners have started asking about it.

SR 11-7 now reaches model risk in LLMs; NYDFS 500 and FINRA 24-09 expect a record of what your AI did and how it was governed. Nothing in the standard stack produces one.

What it does

Comply. Govern. Optimize.

Three integrated capabilities, one deployment — enforcement, evidence, and cost control at the proxy, inside your dedicated infrastructure. Panels below are mocked from real product surfaces; book a 15-minute walkthrough to see live data.

01 / Comply

Evidence an examiner will accept.

Every request, response, policy decision, and human review is captured to immutable storage in your environment — controls map directly to named regulations, not generic best practice.

  • Tamper-evident, hash-chained audit trail — examiner-verifiable, not screenshots
  • Curated examination packages — SR 11-7 · NYDFS 500 · FINRA 24-09 · SOC 2
  • 6-year WORM retention floor (Fully Managed, FINRA 24-09)
  • Reviewer & sign-off workflows with remediation tracking
compliance · posture & audit chain
  • SR 11-7model inventory · controls
    Met
  • NYDFS 500§500.6 audit trail evidence
    Met
  • FINRA 24-09Rule 4511 · supervision
    Met
  • SOC 2 Type Iaudit engaged
    In review
seq 1042
seq 1043
seq 1044

hash-linked · WORM archive · examiner-verifiable

02 / Govern

Policy enforcement at the request layer.

Every prompt and response is inspected in flight — block, redact, or log based on policy, per team, per app, per model.

  • Model allow / deny lists and token limits per workflow
  • Built-in governance rules — PII · MNPI detection, model access, cost, agent safety, schema — extensible via WASM and webhook validators
  • Prompt injection & jailbreak screening
  • Real-time cost caps · draft, review, and publish with shadow mode
governance · live intercept log
  • PROMPT
    PII detectedSSN pattern in user message
    BLOCKED
  • RESPONSE
    Data leakage blockedAPI key exposed in model output
    BLOCKED
  • PROMPT
    Harmful contentPolicy violation · jailbreak attempt
    BLOCKED
  • RESPONSE
    Off-topic driftResponse outside allowed scope
    WARN

03 / Optimize

Cost tied to outcomes and risk.

LLM spend correlated to business outcomes and compliance events in a single view — risk-adjusted spend by team, app, and model, not just raw token bills.

  • Cost analytics tied to business outcomes, not just token counts
  • Per-team budgets with hard caps — every dollar attributed before month-end
  • AI health monitoring with anomaly detection
  • Custom KPIs by workflow, team, and customer segment
analytics · cost & outcomes

AI spend / mo

$12,840

↓ 8%

Success rate

94.2%

↑ 2.1%

Cost / outcome

$7.06

↓ 12%

cost by workflow $/outcome

  • chat-support
    $14.04
  • doc-summary
    $9.12
  • code-gen
    $6.28
  • search
    $4.09
Anomalydoc-summary cost +34% vs. baseline
What makes Meilynx unique

Examiner-grade, not log-grade.

Most tools can log what your AI did. Meilynx proves it — with a tamper-evident record an examiner can independently verify, inside infrastructure that is yours alone.

CapabilityMeilynxDLP / CASBSIEM / log exportBuild it yourself
Inline enforcement at the request layer — before the call leaves your perimeterYesPartialPartial
Reads prompt & response content — PII and MNPI, not just files or metadataYesPartialPartial
Tamper-evident WORM record — not just a log exportYes
Curated examiner packages — SR 11-7 · NYDFS 500 · FINRA 24-09 · SOC 2Yes
Integrity an outside auditor can re-verify, independentlyYes
Per-customer isolated infrastructure — never shared with another institutionYesPartialPartial

Category comparison, not a product-by-product rebuttal. Most tools can log what your AI did; the bottom three rows are where examination evidence is either produced — or it isn't.

Isolation by design

Your data never shares a boundary.

Your proxy runs inside infrastructure dedicated to your organization. Raw prompts and responses never leave your perimeter — only hashed metadata does, never payload. Your financial data never sits alongside another institution's. That isn't a setting; it's the architecture.

Verify us — don't take our word

Integrity you can re-check yourself.

The audit trail is tamper-evident and its integrity is independently verifiable. An examiner or your own auditor can re-compute the hash chain with an open verifier, at any time — the proof doesn't depend on trusting Meilynx.

Architecture

Two planes. One trust boundary.

Each customer gets a dedicated data plane managed by us inside isolated per-customer infrastructure, or run by you on your own. Either way it owns your audit trail. The control plane is a shared SaaS that distributes signed governance bundles and aggregates telemetry metadata — never raw payload. The proxy is going Apache 2.0 at SOC 2 GA; the binary you run is the binary you can read.

Your environment

Managed or self-hosted · isolated either way

Trust boundary
  • Application

    Your apps & agents

  • Meilynx Proxy

    Validators · streaming · audit emission

  • Audit Trail

    WORM archive · hash chain · examination export

Raw prompts & responses never leave this boundary.

Per-customer isolated data plane in every deployment mode

Telemetry

metadata

Bundles

policy-as-code

Meilynx control plane

Managed SaaS

  • Policy authoring

    Signed bundles · policy-as-code

  • Compliance console

    Posture · waivers · examination packages

  • Telemetry rollup

    Metadata only · token counts · rule outcomes

No raw payload data ever reaches the control plane.

Deployment modes

Same isolation. Different operator.

Fully Managed or Self-Hosted — the data-plane isolation invariant holds in both. The difference is who operates the infrastructure.

Dimension

Fully Managed

Meilynx operates per-customer infrastructure · ~1 day

Self-Hosted

Customer operates everything · 1–2 weeks

WORM immutability

Retention-locked object storage

Live

Customer-managed object storage

Customer
Retention floor

6 yr prod · 30 d staging · 1 d test (FINRA 24-09)

Live

Customer-set (proxy default: 90 d)

Customer
Encryption at rest

AES-256-GCM + per-customer CMEK

Live

Customer-managed

Customer
Integrity Pack

Included

Live

Customer-operated

Customer
Verification surface

Hash chain · examiner-verifiable

Live

Hash chain · customer-operated

Customer
Proxy operated by

Meilynx

Live

Customer

Customer

By the numbers

Added latency

<1ms

Built-in rules (regex, token, schema); guard models and webhooks run on configurable budgets

Live providers

4

OpenAI · Anthropic · Google · Azure OpenAI

WORM retention floor

6yr

FINRA 24-09 · Fully Managed production · tamper-evident archive

Change to deploy

1env var

No SDK swap, no app rewrite · ~1 day managed, 1–2 weeks self-hosted

Regulation coverage

Built for financial services.

Controls map directly to named regulations — not generic best practice.

Available as presets today

Curated control bundles ship in the product. Drop in, scope to your environment, go.

SR 11-7NYDFS 23 NYCRR 500FINRA 24-09SOC 2 Type II
Also enforceable via the policy engine today

The policy engine already enforces these control sets. Scope them to your environment with your compliance team.

HIPAA Technical SafeguardsEU AI ActISO 42001NIST AI RMF
Who we serve
BanksBroker-dealersFintechAsset managersHedge fundsInsurance

Trust & compliance posture

SOC 2 Type I· Audit engaged
GDPR
Open source proxy· Apache 2.0 · at SOC 2 GA · source access under NDA
Data residency· Per-customer isolated

Review our full security posture in the Trust Center

Ready to evaluate Meilynx?

Take control of your production AI.

See how Meilynx gives your team full visibility, real-time governance, and data privacy — in one 15-minute walkthrough.

Book a focused 15-minute walkthrough. No commitment.